<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ShaleBlog.com &#187; Marcellus Shale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shaleblog.com/category/marcellus-shale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shaleblog.com</link>
	<description>News about oil and natural gas from shale.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:56:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Worthless Marcellus Leases in New York</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/worthless-marcellus-leases-in-new-york/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/worthless-marcellus-leases-in-new-york/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 16:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/worthless-marcellus-leases-in-new-york.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a long moratorium on Marcellus Shale drilling in New York, a variety of proposed regulations and local bans on drilling could render millions of leased acres as worthless.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a long moratorium on <a title="Marcellus Shale" href="http://geology.com/articles/marcellus-shale.shtml">Marcellus Shale</a> drilling in <a title="New York" href="http://geology.com/states/new-york.shtml">New York</a>, a variety of proposed regulations and local bans on drilling could render millions of leased acres as worthless.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/worthless-marcellus-leases-in-new-york/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$4.7 Billion from Marcellus Gas?</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/4-7-billion-from-marcellus-gas/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/4-7-billion-from-marcellus-gas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 14:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/4-7-billion-from-marcellus-gas.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An AP article reports that drillers produced about $4.7 billion worth of natural gas from the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania and West Virginia during 2011.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An AP article reports that drillers produced about $4.7 billion worth of <a title="natural gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">natural gas</a> from the <a title="Marcellus Shale" href="http://geology.com/articles/marcellus-shale.shtml">Marcellus Shale</a> in <a title="Pennsylvania" href="http://geology.com/states/pennsylvania.shtml">Pennsylvania</a> and West Virginia during 2011.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/4-7-billion-from-marcellus-gas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rouge Fractures</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/rouge-fractures/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/rouge-fractures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barnett Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fayetteville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geophysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ground Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haynesville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydraulic Fracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LNG Import/Export]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niobrara Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upper Devonian Shales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/rouge-fractures.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The chances of rogue fractures due to shale gas fracking operations extending beyond 0.6 kilometres from the injection source is a fraction of one percent, according to new research led by Durham University.  The analysis is based on data from thousands of fracking operations in the USA and natural rock fractures in Europe and Africa."  Quoted from the Durham University press release.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The chances of rogue fractures due to shale gas fracking operations extending beyond 0.6 kilometres from the injection source is a fraction of one percent, according to new research led by Durham University.  The analysis is based on data from thousands of fracking operations in the USA and natural rock fractures in <a title="Europe" href="http://geology.com/news/category/europe.shtml">Europe</a> and <a title="Africa" href="http://geology.com/news/category/africa.shtml">Africa</a>.&#8221;  Quoted from the Durham University press release.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/rouge-fractures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pennsylvania Act 13: Drilling Impact Fee</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/pennsylvania-act-13-drilling-impact-fee/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/pennsylvania-act-13-drilling-impact-fee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/pennsylvania-act-13-drilling-impact-fee.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The law provides for the imposition of a drilling impact fee and the expenditure of the funds generated by that impact fee to local and state purposes specifically outlined in the law. The law also contains a mechanism as to how the fees shall be distributed. A significant portion of the fees generated will be used to cover the local impacts of drilling while several of state agencies will also receive funding for a variety of other purposes."  Quote from the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The law provides for the imposition of a drilling impact fee and the expenditure of the funds generated by that impact fee to local and state purposes specifically outlined in the law. The law also contains a mechanism as to how the fees shall be distributed. A significant portion of the fees generated will be used to cover the local impacts of drilling while several of state agencies will also receive funding for a variety of other purposes.&#8221;  Quote from the <a title="Pennsylvania" href="http://geology.com/states/pennsylvania.shtml">Pennsylvania</a> Public Utility Commission. </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/pennsylvania-act-13-drilling-impact-fee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Geography of Marcellus Drilling in West Virginia</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/geography-of-marcellus-drilling-in-west-virginia/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/geography-of-marcellus-drilling-in-west-virginia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/geography-of-marcellus-drilling-in-west-virginia.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article on TheIntelligencer.net website explains how the geography of natural gas drilling in West Virginia is shifting from the dry gas areas that consists of most of the state to a few counties in the northern panhandle where wells yield natural g...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An article on TheIntelligencer.net website explains how the <a title="geography" href="http://geology.com/world/">geography</a> of <a title="natural gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">natural gas</a> drilling in <a title="West Virginia" href="http://geology.com/states/west-virginia.shtml">West Virginia</a> is shifting from the dry gas areas that consists of most of the state to a few counties in the northern panhandle where wells yield natural gas liquids.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/geography-of-marcellus-drilling-in-west-virginia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shale Gas, Hydraulic Fracturing, and Induced Earthquakes</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/shale-gas-hydraulic-fracturing-and-induced-earthquakes/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/shale-gas-hydraulic-fracturing-and-induced-earthquakes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 05:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydraulic Fracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USGS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/shale-gas-hydraulic-fracturing-and-induced-earthquakes.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["USGS scientists discuss the opportunities and impact associated with hydraulic fracturing. Doug Duncan, associate coordinator for the USGS Energy Resources Program, addresses the increasing role that unconventional oil and gas resources play in the nation's petroleum endowment. USGS hydrologist Dennis Risser discusses some of the major water availability and quality challenges associated with natural gas development, with a focus on the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania. Bill Leith, associate coordinator the USGS Hazards Program, concludes by discussing the potential connection between disposal of waste fluids from hydraulic fracturing and earthquakes."  Quoted from the USGS video release.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<a title="USGS" href="http://geology.com/news/category/usgs.shtml">USGS</a> scientists discuss the opportunities and impact associated with hydraulic fracturing. Doug Duncan, associate coordinator for the USGS <a title="Energy" href="http://geology.com/news/category/energy.shtml">Energy</a> Resources Program, addresses the increasing role that unconventional oil and gas resources play in the nation&#8217;s petroleum endowment. USGS hydrologist Dennis Risser discusses some of the major water availability and quality challenges associated with natural gas development, with a focus on the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania. Bill Leith, associate coordinator the USGS Hazards Program, concludes by discussing the potential connection between disposal of waste fluids from hydraulic fracturing and <a title="earthquakes" href="http://geology.com/earthquakes/">earthquakes</a>.&#8221;  Quoted from the USGS video release.  </p>
<p><iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/vb-BNDx2iIQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/shale-gas-hydraulic-fracturing-and-induced-earthquakes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Propane Fracking in New York’s Marcellus?</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/propane-fracking-in-new-yorks-marcellus/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/propane-fracking-in-new-yorks-marcellus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydraulic Fracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica Shale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/propane-fracking-in-new-yorks-marcellus.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fracking the Marcellus Shale with propane instead of water may be allowed in New York and one company is exploring the possibility of using the method.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fracking the <a title="Marcellus Shale" href="http://geology.com/articles/marcellus-shale.shtml">Marcellus Shale</a> with propane instead of <a title="water" href="http://geology.com/water/">water</a> may be allowed in <a title="New York" href="http://geology.com/states/new-york.shtml">New York</a> and one company is exploring the possibility of using the method.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/propane-fracking-in-new-yorks-marcellus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maryland Natural Gas Severance Tax?</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/maryland-natural-gas-severance-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/maryland-natural-gas-severance-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/maryland-natural-gas-severance-tax.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Maryland House approved a bill that would create a 7.5% severance tax on "all natural gas, natural gas liquids, and other fluid hydrocarbons, not defined as oil, which are produced from a natural reservoir."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a title="Maryland" href="http://geology.com/states/maryland.shtml">Maryland</a> House approved a bill that would create a 7.5% severance tax on &#8220;all <a title="natural gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">natural gas</a>, natural gas liquids, and other fluid hydrocarbons, not defined as oil, which are produced from a natural reservoir.&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/maryland-natural-gas-severance-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sue the State to Control Drilling?</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/sue-the-state-to-control-drilling/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/sue-the-state-to-control-drilling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica Shale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/sue-the-state-to-control-drilling.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seven communities in southwestern Pennsylvania are suing the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania because they want to control natural gas drilling in their zoning districts.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seven communities in southwestern <a title="Pennsylvania" href="http://geology.com/states/pennsylvania.shtml">Pennsylvania</a> are suing the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania because they want to control <a title="natural gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">natural gas</a> drilling in their zoning districts.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/sue-the-state-to-control-drilling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appalachian Natural Gas Targets for 2012</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/appalachian-natural-gas-targets-for-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/appalachian-natural-gas-targets-for-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 02:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/appalachian-natural-gas-targets-for-2012.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article on the Platts.com website summarizes the 2012 drilling plans of Range Resources, EQT Production and Consol Energy.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An article on the Platts.com website summarizes the 2012 drilling plans of Range Resources, EQT Production and Consol <a title="Energy" href="http://geology.com/news/category/energy.shtml">Energy</a>.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/appalachian-natural-gas-targets-for-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Jersey-New York Pipeline</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/new-jersey-new-york-pipeline/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/new-jersey-new-york-pipeline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 02:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/new-jersey-new-york-pipeline.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Spectra Energy has received conditional environmental approval from Federal Energy Regulatory Commission staff on its proposed New Jersey-New York Expansion project. [...] The system, which would be the first major natural gas pipeline to reach New York City in 40 years."  Quoted from the Energy Information Administration.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Spectra <a title="Energy" href="http://geology.com/news/category/energy.shtml">Energy</a> has received conditional environmental approval from Federal Energy Regulatory Commission staff on its proposed New Jersey-New York Expansion project. [...] The system, which would be the first major <a title="natural gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">natural gas</a> <a title="pipeline" href="http://geology.com/news/category/pipelines.shtml">pipeline</a> to reach New York City in 40 years.&#8221;  Quoted from the Energy Information Administration.  </p>
<p><iframe width="420" height="243" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/y7fjX2FCa4k?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/new-jersey-new-york-pipeline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Natural Gas Parallel Universe</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/natural-gas-parallel-universe/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/natural-gas-parallel-universe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica Shale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/natural-gas-parallel-universe.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article titled "Marcellus Shale Parallel Universe" explores the impact of different approaches to natural gas development experienced in Pennsylvania and New York.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An article titled &#8220;<a title="Marcellus Shale" href="http://geology.com/articles/marcellus-shale.shtml">Marcellus Shale</a> Parallel Universe&#8221; explores the impact of different approaches to <a title="natural gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">natural gas</a> development experienced in Pennsylvania and <a title="New York" href="http://geology.com/states/new-york.shtml">New York</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/natural-gas-parallel-universe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Marcellus Pipeline Goes South</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/this-marcellus-pipeline-goes-south/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/this-marcellus-pipeline-goes-south/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 01:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/this-marcellus-pipeline-goes-south.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A $1 billion pipeline has been proposed that will deliver Marcellus Shale gas from northern Pennsylvania to markets in Philadelphia, Baltimore and Washington, DC.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A $1 billion <a title="pipeline" href="http://geology.com/news/category/pipelines.shtml">pipeline</a> has been proposed that will deliver <a title="Marcellus Shale" href="http://geology.com/articles/marcellus-shale.shtml">Marcellus Shale</a> gas from northern <a title="Pennsylvania" href="http://geology.com/states/pennsylvania.shtml">Pennsylvania</a> to markets in Philadelphia, Baltimore and Washington, DC.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/this-marcellus-pipeline-goes-south/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Range Resources “Super-Rich Area”</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/the-range-resources-super-rich-area/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/the-range-resources-super-rich-area/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/the-range-resources-super-rich-area.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Range Resources is starting to focus its Marcellus Shale drilling in a portion of southwestern Pennsylvania known as the "Super-Rich Area".

Information for this story is in a .pdf document here (click the 2/21/2012 company presentation link) [1]

[1] http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=101196&#38;p=irol-presentations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Range Resources is starting to focus its <a title="Marcellus Shale" href="http://geology.com/articles/marcellus-shale.shtml">Marcellus Shale</a> drilling in a portion of southwestern <a title="Pennsylvania" href="http://geology.com/states/pennsylvania.shtml">Pennsylvania</a> known as the &#8220;Super-Rich Area&#8221;.</p>
<p>Information for this story is in a .pdf document <a href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=101196&#038;p=irol-presentations"><strong>here (click the 2/21/2012 company presentation link)</strong></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/the-range-resources-super-rich-area/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hydraulic Fracturing Isn’t the Problem</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/hydraulic-fracturing-isnt-the-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/hydraulic-fracturing-isnt-the-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barnett Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eagle Ford Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fayetteville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ground Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haynesville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydraulic Fracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niobrara Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upper Devonian Shales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/hydraulic-fracturing-isnt-the-problem.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Hydraulic fracturing of shale formations to extract natural gas has no direct connection to reports of groundwater contamination [...] many problems ascribed to hydraulic fracturing are related to processes common to all oil and gas drilling operations, such as casing failures or poor cement jobs."  Quoted from the University of Texas at Austin press release.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<a title="Hydraulic fracturing" href="http://geology.com/articles/hydraulic-fracturing/">Hydraulic fracturing</a> of shale formations to extract natural gas has no direct connection to reports of groundwater <a title="contamination" href="http://geology.com/news/category/contamination.shtml">contamination</a> [...] many problems ascribed to hydraulic fracturing are related to processes common to all oil and gas drilling operations, such as casing failures or poor cement <a title="jobs" href="http://geology.com/jobs.htm">jobs</a>.&#8221;  Quoted from the University of Texas at Austin press release.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/hydraulic-fracturing-isnt-the-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

