<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ShaleBlog.com &#187; Climate Change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shaleblog.com/category/climate-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shaleblog.com</link>
	<description>News about oil and natural gas from shale.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:56:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Electricity from Shale Gas</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/electricity-from-shale-gas/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/electricity-from-shale-gas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 11:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/electricity-from-shale-gas.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Natural gas from shale currently costs half as much as coal per BTU.  Producing electricity with natural gas from shale is more efficient than coal.  Natural gas from shale produces less CO2 than coal when it is used to generate electricity.  What's the problem?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Natural gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">Natural gas</a> from shale currently costs half as much as <a title="coal" href="http://geology.com/rocks/coal.shtml">coal</a> per BTU.  Producing electricity with natural gas from shale is more efficient than coal.  Natural gas from shale produces less CO<sub>2</sub> than coal when it is used to generate electricity.  What&#8217;s the problem?</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/electricity-from-shale-gas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flaring Natural Gas in North Dakota</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/flaring-natural-gas-in-north-dakota/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/flaring-natural-gas-in-north-dakota/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 00:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/flaring-natural-gas-in-north-dakota.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When natural gas is present in a well and no pipeline is available to move it to market or storage that gas has traditionally been flared.  This practice causes concerns related to greenhouse gas production and waste.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When <a title="natural gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">natural gas</a> is present in a well and no <a title="pipeline" href="http://geology.com/news/category/pipelines.shtml">pipeline</a> is available to move it to market or storage that gas has traditionally been flared.  This practice causes concerns related to greenhouse gas production and waste.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/flaring-natural-gas-in-north-dakota/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flaring Natural Gas in North Dakota</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/flaring-natural-gas-in-north-dakota/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/flaring-natural-gas-in-north-dakota/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 00:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/flaring-natural-gas-in-north-dakota.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When natural gas is present in a well and no pipeline is available to move it to market or storage that gas has traditionally been flared.  This practice causes concerns related to greenhouse gas production and waste.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When <a title="natural gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">natural gas</a> is present in a well and no <a title="pipeline" href="http://geology.com/news/category/pipelines.shtml">pipeline</a> is available to move it to market or storage that gas has traditionally been flared.  This practice causes concerns related to greenhouse gas production and waste.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/flaring-natural-gas-in-north-dakota/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate Impact of Fugitive Natural Gas?</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/climate-impact-of-fugitive-natural-gas/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/climate-impact-of-fugitive-natural-gas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydraulic Fracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/climate-impact-of-fugitive-natural-gas.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article in the Los Angeles times points to small amounts of natural gas that are lost during drilling and production and asks: What is the climate impact?  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An article in the Los Angeles times points to small amounts of <a title="natural gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">natural gas</a> that are lost during drilling and production and asks: What is the climate impact?  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/climate-impact-of-fugitive-natural-gas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Shale Gas Cause More Global Warming than Coal?</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/does-shale-gas-cause-more-global-warming-than-coal/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/does-shale-gas-cause-more-global-warming-than-coal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 01:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=3220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/carbon-dioxide.gif" class="alignright"/>A post on an environmental blog at the Baltimore Sun website has a punchy title:  &#8220;Marcellus shale gas &#8220;dirtier&#8221; than coal?&#8221;&#8230;. Dirty might have been used to provoke shale advocates or to elicit clicks from environmental advocates, however, they ask a question about methane releases canceling out any carbon dioxide benefits gained by using natural gas as a few instead of coal.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/carbon-dioxide.gif" class="alignright">A post on an environmental blog at the <a href="http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/features/green/2011/02/marcellus_shale_gas_dirtier_th.html?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed:+B-moreGreen+(B'More+Green)">Baltimore Sun</a> website has a punchy title:  &#8220;<a title="Marcellus shale" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/marcellus-shale/">Marcellus shale</a> gas &#8220;dirtier&#8221; than coal?&#8221;&#8230;. Dirty might have been used to provoke shale advocates or to elicit clicks from environmental advocates, however, they ask a question about methane releases canceling out any carbon dioxide benefits gained by using natural gas as a few instead of coal.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/does-shale-gas-cause-more-global-warming-than-coal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Congress Neglecting Natural Gas?</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/is-congress-neglecting-natural-gas/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/is-congress-neglecting-natural-gas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uses of Natural Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=3006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In a blog post on the Reuter&#8217;s.com website, Christopher Swann, argues that Washington could take easy steps to reduce America&#8217;s dependence on foreign oil, reduce carbon emissions and save citizens money by promoting the use of natural gas in vehicles and electricity generation.  He thinks that the natural gas lobby needs to work harder than those promoting coal and railroads.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a blog post on the Reuter&#8217;s.com website, Christopher Swann, argues that Washington could take easy steps to reduce America&#8217;s dependence on foreign oil, reduce carbon emissions and save citizens money by promoting the <a title="use of natural gas" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/uses-of-natural-gas/">use of natural gas</a> in vehicles and electricity generation.  He thinks that the natural gas lobby needs to work harder than those promoting coal and railroads.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/is-congress-neglecting-natural-gas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

