<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ShaleBlog.com &#187; Canada Gas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shaleblog.com/category/canada-gas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shaleblog.com</link>
	<description>News about oil and natural gas from shale.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:57:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Kitimat LNG:  Canadian Natural Gas to Asia</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/kitimat-lng-canadian-natural-gas-to-asia/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/kitimat-lng-canadian-natural-gas-to-asia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 05:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LNG Import/Export]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/kitimat-lng-canadian-natural-gas-to-asia.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A terminal to ship liquefied natural gas from Canada to Asian markets is being built near Kitimat, British Columbia.  The terminal will have a significant transportation distance advantage over natural gas projects being built in Australia and Indonesia.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A terminal to ship liquefied natural gas from Canada to Asian markets is being built near Kitimat, <a title="British Columbia" href="http://geology.com/canada/british-columbia.shtml">British Columbia</a>.  The terminal will have a significant transportation distance advantage over natural gas projects being built in <a title="Australia" href="http://geology.com/news/category/australia.shtml">Australia</a> and <a title="Indonesia" href="http://geology.com/news/category/indonesia.shtml">Indonesia</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/kitimat-lng-canadian-natural-gas-to-asia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Much Oil is in the Bakken?</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/how-much-oil-is-in-the-bakken/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/how-much-oil-is-in-the-bakken/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 05:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/how-much-oil-is-in-the-bakken.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although the United States Geological Survey estimates that the Bakken Formation beneath parts of North Dakota, Montana and Canada might contain over 4 billion barrels of oil, Harold Hamm, believes that it might contain up to 24 billion barrels.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the <a title="United States Geological Survey" href="http://geology.com/news/category/usgs.shtml">United States Geological Survey</a> estimates that the <a title="Bakken Formation" href="http://geology.com/usgs/bakken-formation-oil.shtml">Bakken Formation</a> beneath parts of North Dakota, <a title="Montana" href="http://geology.com/states/montana.shtml">Montana</a> and Canada might contain over 4 billion barrels of oil, Harold Hamm, believes that it might contain up to 24 billion barrels.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/how-much-oil-is-in-the-bakken/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Record North American Oil Production by 2016?</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/record-north-american-oil-production-by-2016/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/record-north-american-oil-production-by-2016/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/record-north-american-oil-production-by-2016.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article in the Houston Chronicle points to the rapidly rising rates of oil production in the United States and Canada.  If current trends continue North America could be producing record amounts of oil by 2016.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An article in the Houston Chronicle points to the rapidly rising rates of oil production in the United States and Canada.  If current trends continue North America could be producing record amounts of oil by 2016.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/record-north-american-oil-production-by-2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Record North American Oil Production by 2016?</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/record-north-american-oil-production-by-2016/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/record-north-american-oil-production-by-2016/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/record-north-american-oil-production-by-2016.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article in the Houston Chronicle points to the rapidly rising rates of oil production in the United States and Canada.  If current trends continue North America could be producing record amounts of oil by 2016.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An article in the Houston Chronicle points to the rapidly rising rates of oil production in the United States and Canada.  If current trends continue North America could be producing record amounts of oil by 2016.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/record-north-american-oil-production-by-2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Natural Gas to Asia from Kitimat, BC</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/natural-gas-to-asia-from-kitimat-bc/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/natural-gas-to-asia-from-kitimat-bc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 05:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LNG Import/Export]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/natural-gas-to-asia-from-kitimat-bc.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Natural gas prices in Asia are three times higher than prices in North America.  Natural gas producers, Apache, Encana and EOG Resources hope to cash in on that by building a liquefied natural gas plant near Kitimat, British Colombia that will prepare ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Natural gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">Natural gas</a> prices in Asia are three times higher than prices in North America.  Natural gas producers, Apache, Encana and EOG Resources hope to cash in on that by building a <a title="liquefied natural gas" href="http://geology.com/articles/lng-liquefied-natural-gas/">liquefied natural gas</a> plant near Kitimat, British Colombia that will prepare LNG for shipment to Asian customers.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/natural-gas-to-asia-from-kitimat-bc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canadian LNG for Asia-Pacific</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/canadian-lng-for-asia-pacific/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/canadian-lng-for-asia-pacific/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 02:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LNG Import/Export]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/canadian-lng-for-asia-pacific.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Construction on the Kitimat LNG export terminal is about to begin.  The facility on the northern coast of British Columbia is being built with an eye on the Asia-Pacific market.  New terminals are also underway at Douglas Channel and Prince Rupert.  Mo...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Construction on the Kitimat <a title="LNG" href="http://geology.com/articles/lng-liquefied-natural-gas/">LNG</a> export terminal is about to begin.  The facility on the northern coast of <a title="British Columbia" href="http://geology.com/canada/british-columbia.shtml">British Columbia</a> is being built with an eye on the Asia-Pacific market.  New terminals are also underway at Douglas Channel and Prince Rupert.  Most of the gas for these terminals is coming from new shale plays.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/canadian-lng-for-asia-pacific/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Imports of Natural Gas Drop Sharply</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/us-imports-of-natural-gas-drop-sharply/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/us-imports-of-natural-gas-drop-sharply/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 16:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LNG Import/Export]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas Markets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=3385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/united-states.jpg" class="alignright"/>&#8220;Net imports of natural gas continue at much lower levels than in previous years, likely as a result of higher U.S. domestic production. [...] During the report week, net Canadian imports averaged 5.3 Bcf per day, which is 20.7 percent lower than the same week in 2010. Sendout from U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) import terminals averaged about 1.1 Bcf per day during the report week, or 8.2 percent lower than the same week in 2010.&#8221;  Quote from the Energy Information Administration&#8217;s Natural Gas Weekly Update.  &#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/united-states.jpg" class="alignright">&#8220;Net imports of natural gas continue at much lower levels than in previous years, likely as a result of higher U.S. domestic <a title="production" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/resource-production/">production</a>. [...] During the report week, net Canadian imports averaged 5.3 Bcf per day, which is 20.7 percent lower than the same week in 2010. Sendout from U.S. liquefied natural gas (<a title="LNG" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/lng/">LNG</a>) import terminals averaged about 1.1 Bcf per day during the report week, or 8.2 percent lower than the same week in 2010.&#8221;  Quote from the <a href="http://www.eia.gov/oog/info/ngw/ngupdate.asp">Energy Information Administration&#8217;s Natural Gas Weekly Update</a>.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/us-imports-of-natural-gas-drop-sharply/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canadian Natural Gas Production Drop Expected</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/canadian-natural-gas-production-drop-expected/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/canadian-natural-gas-production-drop-expected/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 14:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource & Production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=3343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/canada-flag.jpg" class="alignright"/>An oversupply of natural gas in the United States and the movement of natural gas drillers to more lucrative oil targets is expected to cause a drop in the amount of natural gas produced in Canada.  More in the Calgary Herald.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/canada-flag.jpg" class="alignright">An oversupply of natural gas in the United States and the movement of natural gas drillers to more lucrative oil targets is expected to cause a drop in the amount of natural gas produced in <a title="Canada" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/canada-gas/">Canada</a>.  More in the <a href="http://www.calgaryherald.com/Natural+production+expected+slide/4774609/story.html">Calgary Herald</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/canadian-natural-gas-production-drop-expected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Macasty Shale &#8211; Anticosti Island, Quebec</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/macasty-shale-anticosti-island-quebec/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/macasty-shale-anticosti-island-quebec/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 17:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource & Production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=3330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/canada-flag.jpg" alt="" title="canada-flag" width="135" height="68" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2004" />An article on the OilPrice.com website reports on the Macasty Shale that occurs above the Trenton Black River on Anticosti Island, Quebec, Canada.  &#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/canada-flag.jpg" alt="" title="canada-flag" width="135" height="68" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2004" />An article on the <a href="http://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/The-Shale-Oil-Boom-No-One-s-Talking-About-Until-Now.html">OilPrice.com website</a> reports on the Macasty Shale that occurs above the Trenton Black River on Anticosti Island, Quebec, <a title="Canada" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/canada-gas/">Canada</a>.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/macasty-shale-anticosti-island-quebec/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PetroChina Buying Canadian Shale for $5.4 Billion</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/petrochina-buying-canadian-shale-for-5-4-billion/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/petrochina-buying-canadian-shale-for-5-4-billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Gas Shales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas Investments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=3123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/petrochina.gif" class="alignright"/>PetroChina plans to purchase half of EnCana’s Montney Shale assets in Alberta and British Columbia for $5.4 billion (Canadian).  In the past 14 months Chinese oil and gas companies have acquired $46 billion in foreign resources.  More at RigZone.com.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/petrochina.gif" class="alignright">PetroChina plans to purchase half of <a title="EnCana" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/encana/">EnCana</a>’s Montney Shale assets in Alberta and British Columbia for $5.4 billion (Canadian).  In the past 14 months Chinese oil and gas companies have acquired $46 billion in foreign resources.  More at <a href="http://www.rigzone.com/news/article.asp?hpf=1&#038;a_id=104162">RigZone.com</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/petrochina-buying-canadian-shale-for-5-4-billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public Opposition to Utica Shale Development in Quebec</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/public-opposition-to-utica-shale-development-in-quebec/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/public-opposition-to-utica-shale-development-in-quebec/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource & Production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica Shale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=3100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/utica-shale.gif" alt="" title="utica-shale" width="250" height="180" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2956" />An article in the Montreal Gazette says that development of the Utica Shale in Quebec is encountering public opposition. In Quebec, landowners do not directly participate in natural gas royalties and lease payments as is customary in the United States.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/utica-shale.gif" alt="" title="utica-shale" width="250" height="180" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2956" />An <a href="http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Bouchard+will+face+tough+sell+over+shale/4182128/story.html">article in the Montreal Gazette</a> says that development of the <a title="Utica Shale" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/utica-shale/">Utica Shale</a> in Quebec is encountering public opposition. In Quebec, landowners do not directly participate in natural gas royalties and <a title="lease" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/leases-royalties/">lease</a> payments as is customary in the United States.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/public-opposition-to-utica-shale-development-in-quebec/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Much Oil is in the Bakken and Three Forks Formations?</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/how-much-oil-is-in-the-bakken-and-three-forks-formations/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/how-much-oil-is-in-the-bakken-and-three-forks-formations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 22:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource & Production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=3097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/bakken-formation-map.gif" alt="" title="bakken-formation-map" width="180" height="144" class="alignright size-full wp-image-3098" />Diverging estimates by three different organizations with significant expertise in oil and natural gas assessments leave one wondering how much oil really is in the Bakken and Three Forks Formations?  Read the details on the Trib.com website.</p>
<p>Here are the estimates….<br />
USGS&#8230;. 	4.3 billion barrels<br />
North Dakota Geological Survey&#8230;. 	11 billion barrels<br />
Continental Resources&#8230;. 	20 billion barrels&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/bakken-formation-map.gif" alt="" title="bakken-formation-map" width="180" height="144" class="alignright size-full wp-image-3098" />Diverging estimates by three different organizations with significant expertise in oil and natural gas assessments leave one wondering how much oil really is in the Bakken and <a title="Three Forks" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/three-forks/">Three Forks</a> Formations?  Read the details on the <a href="http://trib.com/business/article_885dc655-4bcb-513e-9cb7-9ca72d2076ce.html">Trib.com website</a>.</p>
<p>Here are the estimates….<br />
USGS&#8230;. 	4.3 billion barrels<br />
North Dakota Geological Survey&#8230;. 	11 billion barrels<br />
Continental Resources&#8230;. 	20 billion barrels</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/how-much-oil-is-in-the-bakken-and-three-forks-formations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romancing the Utica Shale in Quebec</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/romancing-the-utica-shale-in-quebec/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/romancing-the-utica-shale-in-quebec/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica Shale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=3044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/utica-shale.gif" alt="" title="utica-shale" width="250" height="180" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2956" />Michael Binnion, CEO of Questerre Energy, is spending a lot of time meeting with citizen groups across Quebec, trying to convince them that drilling for the Utica Shale will be a safe development in their province.  There has been very little energy activity in Quebec&#8217;s history. More at the Calgary Sun.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/utica-shale.gif"><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/utica-shale.gif" alt="" title="utica-shale" width="250" height="180" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2956" /></a>Michael Binnion, CEO of Questerre Energy, is spending a lot of time meeting with citizen groups across Quebec, trying to convince them that drilling for the <a title="Utica Shale" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/utica-shale/">Utica Shale</a> will be a safe development in their province.  There has been very little energy activity in Quebec&#8217;s history. More at the <a href="http://www.calgarysun.com/money/2011/01/06/16789586.html">Calgary Sun</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/romancing-the-utica-shale-in-quebec/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Utica Shale: The Natural Gas Giant Beneath the Marcellus</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/utica-shale-the-natural-gas-giant-beneath-the-marcellus/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/utica-shale-the-natural-gas-giant-beneath-the-marcellus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collingwood Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drilling Activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horizontal Drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydrofracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leases & Royalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maps & Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource & Production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shale Geology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=2949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/utica-shale.gif" alt="Utica Shale" title="utica-shale" class="alignright"/>A rock layer below the Marcellus Shale could prove to be another incredible source of natural gas. The Utica Shale is thicker, more geographically extensive and has already proven its ability to support commercial production.  </p>
<p>View the article, maps and other graphics at Geology.com.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://geology.com/articles/utica-shale/"><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/utica-shale.gif" alt="Utica Shale" title="utica-shale" class="alignright"></a>A rock layer below the <a title="Marcellus Shale" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/marcellus-shale/">Marcellus Shale</a> could prove to be another incredible source of natural gas. The <a title="Utica Shale" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/utica-shale/">Utica Shale</a> is thicker, more geographically extensive and has already proven its ability to support commercial <a title="production" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/resource-production/">production</a>.  </p>
<p>View the <a href="http://geology.com/articles/utica-shale/">article, maps and other graphics at Geology.com</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/utica-shale-the-natural-gas-giant-beneath-the-marcellus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sassol Buys Into the Montney Shale</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2010/sassol-buys-into-the-montney-shale/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2010/sassol-buys-into-the-montney-shale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montney Formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas Companies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=2853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://www.sasol.com/sasol_internet/frontend/common/sasollogo_small.gif" class="alignright"/>Sassol, a South African oil and gas company, will pay Talisman Energy $1 billion for a stake in the Montney Shale gas play of British Columbia.  More in the Globe and Mail.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://www.sasol.com/sasol_internet/frontend/common/sasollogo_small.gif" class="alignright">Sassol, a South African oil and gas company, will pay Talisman Energy $1 billion for a stake in the <a href="http://shaleblog.com/category/montney-formation/">Montney Shale</a> gas play of <a href="http://geology.com/canada/british-columbia.shtml">British Columbia</a>.  More in the <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/talisman-gets-partner-in-bc-shale-gas-play/article1844184/">Globe and Mail</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2010/sassol-buys-into-the-montney-shale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

