<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ShaleBlog.com &#187; Barnett Shale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shaleblog.com/category/barnett-shale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shaleblog.com</link>
	<description>News about oil and natural gas from shale.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:44:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Texas: Fracking Chemicals and Water Consumption Reports</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/texas-fracking-chemicals-and-water-consumption-reports/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/texas-fracking-chemicals-and-water-consumption-reports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barnett Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eagle Ford Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydraulic Fracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/37372.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new regulation will require drillers in Texas to report the chemicals in their hydraulic fracturing fluid and the amount of water used to frack each well.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new regulation will require drillers in <a title="Texas" href="http://geology.com/states/texas.shtml">Texas</a> to report the chemicals in their <a title="hydraulic fracturing" href="http://geology.com/articles/hydraulic-fracturing/">hydraulic fracturing</a> fluid and the amount of <a title="water" href="http://geology.com/water/">water</a> used to frack each well.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/texas-fracking-chemicals-and-water-consumption-reports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Declining Royalty Payments from Natural Gas Wells</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/declining-royalty-payments-from-natural-gas-wells/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/declining-royalty-payments-from-natural-gas-wells/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 01:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arkansas Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barnett Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eagle Ford Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fayetteville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haynesville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydraulic Fracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niobrara Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upper Devonian Shales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica Shale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/declining-royalty-payments-from-natural-gas-wells.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many property owners are very surprised when the royalties that they receive from a natural gas well on their property decline sharply.  They are learning about production decline curves.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many property owners are very surprised when the royalties that they receive from a <a title="natural gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">natural gas</a> well on their property decline sharply.  They are learning about production decline curves.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/declining-royalty-payments-from-natural-gas-wells/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Learning about Oil and Gas Leases</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/learning-about-oil-and-gas-leases/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/learning-about-oil-and-gas-leases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 05:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barnett Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fayetteville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haynesville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niobrara Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica Shale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/learning-about-oil-and-gas-leases.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article in the New York Times reviews some potential rewards and problems that occur when a landowner decides to lease his property for oil and and gas development. 

Related:  Mineral Rights [1]

[1] http://geology.com/articles/mineral-rights.shtml]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An article in the <a title="New York" href="http://geology.com/states/new-york.shtml">New York</a> Times reviews some potential rewards and problems that occur when a landowner decides to lease his property for oil and and gas development. </p>
<p>Related:  <a href="http://geology.com/articles/mineral-rights.shtml">Mineral Rights</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/learning-about-oil-and-gas-leases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Declining Production from the Barnett Shale</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/declining-production-from-the-barnett-shale/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/declining-production-from-the-barnett-shale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 05:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barnett Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydraulic Fracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/declining-production-from-the-barnett-shale.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article on the Star-Telegram.com website explores declining production from the Barnett Shale of Texas - the rock unit that supported the first important use of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An article on the Star-Telegram.com website explores declining production from the <a title="Barnett Shale" href="http://geology.com/research/barnett-shale-gas.shtml">Barnett Shale</a> of <a title="Texas" href="http://geology.com/states/texas.shtml">Texas</a> &#8211; the rock unit that supported the first important use of horizontal drilling and <a title="hydraulic fracturing" href="http://geology.com/articles/hydraulic-fracturing/">hydraulic fracturing</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/declining-production-from-the-barnett-shale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barnett Shale:  100,000 Jobs and $65 Billion</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/barnett-shale-100000-jobs-and-65-billion/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/barnett-shale-100000-jobs-and-65-billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 05:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barnett Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geologist Career]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/barnett-shale-100000-jobs-and-65-billion.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article on the BizJournals.com website summarizes the economic impact of natural gas development in the Barnett Shale of Texas.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An article on the BizJournals.com website summarizes the economic impact of <a title="natural gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">natural gas</a> development in the <a title="Barnett Shale" href="http://geology.com/research/barnett-shale-gas.shtml">Barnett Shale</a> of <a title="Texas" href="http://geology.com/states/texas.shtml">Texas</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/barnett-shale-100000-jobs-and-65-billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh No!  Who Really Owns the Natural Gas in Shale?</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/oh-no-who-really-owns-the-natural-gas-in-shale/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/oh-no-who-really-owns-the-natural-gas-in-shale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 17:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barnett Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eagle Ford Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haynesville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydraulic Fracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minerals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niobrara Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upper Devonian Shales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica Shale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/oh-no-who-really-owns-the-natural-gas-in-shale.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is natural gas part of the shale or is it a fugitive commodity that is not an integral part of any specific rock unit?  Will a refined legal definition of natural gas in Pennsylvania overturn thousands of historic leases?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is <a title="natural gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">natural gas</a> part of the shale or is it a fugitive commodity that is not an integral part of any specific rock unit?  Will a refined legal definition of natural gas in <a title="Pennsylvania" href="http://geology.com/states/pennsylvania.shtml">Pennsylvania</a> overturn thousands of historic leases?</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/oh-no-who-really-owns-the-natural-gas-in-shale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>35 Wells on One Barnett Shale Drilling Pad</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/35-wells-on-one-barnett-shale-drilling-pad/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/35-wells-on-one-barnett-shale-drilling-pad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 05:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barnett Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/35-wells-on-one-barnett-shale-drilling-pad.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Devon Energy has drilled over 4,700 wells in the Barnett Shale field since 2001.  Today they are in the process of drilling 35 horizontal wells, all at different compass directions, from a single 12-acre pad.  This is believed to be the largest number ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Devon <a title="Energy" href="http://geology.com/news/category/energy.shtml">Energy</a> has drilled over 4,700 wells in the <a title="Barnett Shale" href="http://geology.com/research/barnett-shale-gas.shtml">Barnett Shale</a> field since 2001.  Today they are in the process of drilling 35 horizontal wells, all at different compass directions, from a single 12-acre pad.  This is believed to be the largest number of wells ever drilled from a single Barnett Shale pad.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/35-wells-on-one-barnett-shale-drilling-pad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Geographic History of Barnett Shale Drilling Activity</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/geographic-history-of-barnett-shale-drilling-activity/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/geographic-history-of-barnett-shale-drilling-activity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 05:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barnett Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/geographic-history-of-barnett-shale-drilling-activity.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Energy Information Administration has an interesting animated map on their website that shows the geographic spread of drilling activity in the Barnett Shale around Fort Worth, Texas.  It also shows the introduction and spread of horizontal drillin...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a title="Energy" href="http://geology.com/news/category/energy.shtml">Energy</a> Information Administration has an interesting animated map on their website that shows the geographic spread of drilling activity in the <a title="Barnett Shale" href="http://geology.com/research/barnett-shale-gas.shtml">Barnett Shale</a> around Fort Worth, <a title="Texas" href="http://geology.com/states/texas.shtml">Texas</a>.  It also shows the introduction and spread of horizontal drilling activity throughout the Barnett Shale gas play.</p>
<p><img src="http://geology.com/news/2011/barnett-shale-drilling.gif"></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/geographic-history-of-barnett-shale-drilling-activity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shale Gas and U.S. National Security</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/shale-gas-and-u-s-national-security/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/shale-gas-and-u-s-national-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 05:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barnett Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eagle Ford Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fayetteville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas Pipelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haynesville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LNG Import/Export]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niobrara Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics and Geology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upper Devonian Shales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica Shale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/shale-gas-and-u-s-national-security.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Baker Institute for Public Policy at Rice University has published a report titled: "Shale Gas and U.S. National Security".  "This study assesses the impact of U.S. domestic shale gas development on energy security and U.S. national security, with emphasis on the geopolitical consequences of rising supplies of U.S. natural gas from shale and the implications for U.S. foreign policy."  Quoted from the report summary.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Baker Institute for Public Policy at Rice University has published a report titled: &#8220;Shale Gas and U.S. National Security&#8221;.  &#8220;This study assesses the impact of U.S. domestic shale gas development on energy security and U.S. national security, with emphasis on the geopolitical consequences of rising supplies of U.S. natural gas from shale and the implications for U.S. foreign policy.&#8221;  Quoted from the report summary.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/shale-gas-and-u-s-national-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brine Contamination Associated with Oil and Gas Production in the Williston Basin</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/brine-contamination-associated-with-oil-and-gas-production-in-the-williston-basin/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/brine-contamination-associated-with-oil-and-gas-production-in-the-williston-basin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 16:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barnett Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=3370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/bakken-formation-map.gif" class="alignright"/>&#8220;U.S. Geological Survey scientists and cooperating partners are examining the potential risk to aquatic resources by contamination from saline waters produced by petroleum development in the Williston Basin of Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota.&#8221;  Quoted from the USGS publication release. &#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/bakken-formation-map.gif" class="alignright">&#8220;U.S. Geological Survey scientists and cooperating partners are examining the potential risk to aquatic resources by contamination from saline waters produced by petroleum development in the Williston Basin of Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota.&#8221;  Quoted from the <a href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2011/3047/">USGS publication release</a>. </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/brine-contamination-associated-with-oil-and-gas-production-in-the-williston-basin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chesapeake Energy: Land Acquisition Machine</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/chesapeake-energy-land-acquisition-machine/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/chesapeake-energy-land-acquisition-machine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 16:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barnett Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chesapeake Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collingwood Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eagle Ford Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fayetteville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haynesville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horn River Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leases & Royalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Albany Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niobrara Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource & Production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shale Properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Three Forks-Sanish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woodford Shale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=3321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/chesapeake-energy.gif" class="alignright"/>A post on the Seeking Alpha blog details how successful Chesapeake Energy has been at rapidly leasing enormous acreages in all of the major natural gas shale plays in the United States.  They author calls them a &#8220;land acquisition machine&#8221;.  &#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/chesapeake-energy.gif" class="alignright">A post on the <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/268062-post-earnings-chesapeake-ceo-still-unhappy-with-share-price">Seeking Alpha blog</a> details how successful <a title="Chesapeake Energy" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/chesapeake-energy/">Chesapeake Energy</a> has been at rapidly leasing enormous acreages in all of the major natural gas shale plays in the United States.  They author calls them a &#8220;land acquisition machine&#8221;.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/chesapeake-energy-land-acquisition-machine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Impact of Barnett Shale Development on Groundwater Resources</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/impact-of-barnett-shale-development-on-groundwater-resources/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/impact-of-barnett-shale-development-on-groundwater-resources/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 14:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barnett Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydrofracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=3282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The impact of hydraulic fracturing on ground water supplies is a concern in almost every area where the well stimulation method is employed.  The Texas Water Development Board has published an informative study:  <em>Northern Trinity/Woodbine GAM Assessment of Groundwater Use  in the Northern Trinity Aquifer  Due To Urban Growth and  Barnett Shale Development</em>.  Get the report here. &#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The impact of <a title="hydraulic fracturing" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/hydrofracturing/">hydraulic fracturing</a> on ground water supplies is a concern in almost every area where the well stimulation method is employed.  The Texas Water Development Board has published an informative study:  <em>Northern Trinity/Woodbine GAM Assessment of Groundwater Use  in the Northern Trinity Aquifer  Due To Urban Growth and  <a title="Barnett Shale" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/barnett-shale/">Barnett Shale</a> Development</em>.  <a href="http://www.twdb.state.tx.us/RWPG/rpgm_rpts/0604830613_BarnetShale.pdf">Get the report here</a>. </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/impact-of-barnett-shale-development-on-groundwater-resources/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which is the Leader? Barnett or Haynesville Shale?</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/which-is-the-leader-barnett-or-haynesville-shale/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/which-is-the-leader-barnett-or-haynesville-shale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barnett Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haynesville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource & Production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=3277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/horizontal-well.jpg" class="alignright"/>The Energy Information Administration recently reported that production from the Haynesville Shale had surpassed Barnett Shale production.  Now, energy statisticians are arguing over the numbers.  More at Platts.com.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/horizontal-well.jpg" class="alignright">The Energy Information Administration recently reported that <a title="production" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/resource-production/">production</a> from the <a title="Haynesville Shale" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/haynesville-shale/">Haynesville Shale</a> had surpassed <a title="Barnett Shale" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/barnett-shale/">Barnett Shale</a> production.  Now, energy statisticians are arguing over the numbers.  More at <a href="http://www.platts.com/RSSFeedDetailedNews/RSSFeed/NaturalGas/6951988">Platts.com</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/which-is-the-leader-barnett-or-haynesville-shale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA vs Texas Railroad Commission</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/epa-vs-texas-railroad-commission/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/epa-vs-texas-railroad-commission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barnett Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eagle Ford Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=3259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/texas-county-map.gif" class="alignright"/>The Railroad Commission has jurisdiction of natural gas drilling in Texas and the commission disagrees with the United States Environmental Protection Agency on the cause of domestic water well contamination in North Texas.  EPA claims that Barnett Shale drilling has caused the problem.  More in the Washington Post.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/texas-county-map.gif" class="alignright">The Railroad Commission has jurisdiction of natural gas drilling in Texas and the commission disagrees with the United States Environmental Protection Agency on the cause of domestic water well contamination in North Texas.  EPA claims that <a title="Barnett Shale" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/barnett-shale/">Barnett Shale</a> drilling has caused the problem.  More in the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/texas-agency-epa-wrong-gas-driller-not-responsible-for-contaminating-dallas-area-water-wells/2011/03/22/ABSdDgDB_story.html">Washington Post</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/epa-vs-texas-railroad-commission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Haynesville Shale is the Top Shale Gas Producer</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/haynesville-shale-is-the-top-shale-gas-producer/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/haynesville-shale-is-the-top-shale-gas-producer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 13:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barnett Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haynesville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource & Production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=3256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/horizontal-well.jpg" class="alignright"/>According to an article in the Houston Chronicle, the Haynesville Shale of Louisiana is now producing more natural gas than the Barnett  Shale of Texas, running at a rate of about 5.5 billion cubic feet per day.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/horizontal-well.jpg" class="alignright">According to an article in the <a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/tx/7478678.html">Houston Chronicle</a>, the <a title="Haynesville Shale" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/haynesville-shale/">Haynesville Shale</a> of Louisiana is now producing more natural gas than the Barnett  Shale of Texas, running at a rate of about 5.5 billion cubic feet per day.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/haynesville-shale-is-the-top-shale-gas-producer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

