<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ShaleBlog.com &#187; Bakken Shale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shaleblog.com/category/bakken-shale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shaleblog.com</link>
	<description>News about oil and natural gas from shale.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:56:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rouge Fractures</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/rouge-fractures/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/rouge-fractures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barnett Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fayetteville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geophysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ground Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haynesville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydraulic Fracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LNG Import/Export]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niobrara Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upper Devonian Shales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/rouge-fractures.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The chances of rogue fractures due to shale gas fracking operations extending beyond 0.6 kilometres from the injection source is a fraction of one percent, according to new research led by Durham University.  The analysis is based on data from thousands of fracking operations in the USA and natural rock fractures in Europe and Africa."  Quoted from the Durham University press release.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The chances of rogue fractures due to shale gas fracking operations extending beyond 0.6 kilometres from the injection source is a fraction of one percent, according to new research led by Durham University.  The analysis is based on data from thousands of fracking operations in the USA and natural rock fractures in <a title="Europe" href="http://geology.com/news/category/europe.shtml">Europe</a> and <a title="Africa" href="http://geology.com/news/category/africa.shtml">Africa</a>.&#8221;  Quoted from the Durham University press release.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/rouge-fractures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Objections to Natural Gas Flaring</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/objections-to-natural-gas-flaring/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/objections-to-natural-gas-flaring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eagle Ford Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niobrara Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/objections-to-natural-gas-flaring.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drilling for oil in the shale formations of Texas and North Dakota often results in the flaring of natural gas - as some of these areas are not served by natural gas pipelines.  Although this practice is somewhat of an industry tradition it is drawing increasing criticism because it wastes a non-renewable energy resource, is an economic loss, produces air pollution and contributes to climate change.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drilling for oil in the shale formations of Texas and North Dakota often results in the flaring of <a title="natural gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">natural gas</a> &#8211; as some of these areas are not served by natural gas pipelines.  Although this practice is somewhat of an industry tradition it is drawing increasing criticism because it wastes a non-renewable <a title="energy" href="http://geology.com/news/category/energy.shtml">energy</a> resource, is an economic loss, produces air pollution and contributes to <a title="climate change" href="http://geology.com/climate-change/">climate change</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/objections-to-natural-gas-flaring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Crude Oil Trends</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/state-crude-oil-trends/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/state-crude-oil-trends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alaska Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eagle Ford Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/state-crude-oil-trends.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Five states account for over 50% of the USA's crude oil production with production rapidly increasing in Texas and North Dakota.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Five states account for over 50% of the USA&#8217;s crude oil production with production rapidly increasing in <a title="Texas" href="http://geology.com/states/texas.shtml">Texas</a> and <a title="North Dakota" href="http://geology.com/states/north-dakota.shtml">North Dakota</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.eia.gov/12/crude-oil-by-state.png"></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/state-crude-oil-trends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hydraulic Fracturing Isn’t the Problem</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/hydraulic-fracturing-isnt-the-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/hydraulic-fracturing-isnt-the-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barnett Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eagle Ford Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fayetteville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ground Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haynesville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydraulic Fracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niobrara Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upper Devonian Shales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/hydraulic-fracturing-isnt-the-problem.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Hydraulic fracturing of shale formations to extract natural gas has no direct connection to reports of groundwater contamination [...] many problems ascribed to hydraulic fracturing are related to processes common to all oil and gas drilling operations, such as casing failures or poor cement jobs."  Quoted from the University of Texas at Austin press release.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<a title="Hydraulic fracturing" href="http://geology.com/articles/hydraulic-fracturing/">Hydraulic fracturing</a> of shale formations to extract natural gas has no direct connection to reports of groundwater <a title="contamination" href="http://geology.com/news/category/contamination.shtml">contamination</a> [...] many problems ascribed to hydraulic fracturing are related to processes common to all oil and gas drilling operations, such as casing failures or poor cement <a title="jobs" href="http://geology.com/jobs.htm">jobs</a>.&#8221;  Quoted from the University of Texas at Austin press release.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/hydraulic-fracturing-isnt-the-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Dakota Sets Records for Oil and Natural Gas in 2011</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/north-dakota-sets-records-for-oil-and-natural-gas-in-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/north-dakota-sets-records-for-oil-and-natural-gas-in-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/north-dakota-sets-records-for-oil-and-natural-gas-in-2011.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oil and natural gas production in North Dakota is at all-time highs, fueled by intense drilling activity in the Bakken Formation, Three Forks Formations and other rock units.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oil and <a title="natural gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">natural gas</a> production in <a title="North Dakota" href="http://geology.com/states/north-dakota.shtml">North Dakota</a> is at all-time highs, fueled by intense drilling activity in the <a title="Bakken Formation" href="http://geology.com/usgs/bakken-formation-oil.shtml">Bakken Formation</a>, Three Forks Formations and other rock units.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/north-dakota-sets-records-for-oil-and-natural-gas-in-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dry Shale Gas Production Trends</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/dry-shale-gas-production-trends/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/dry-shale-gas-production-trends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barnett Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eagle Ford Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fayetteville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haynesville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/dry-shale-gas-production-trends.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The EIA Natural Gas Weekly Update has an interesting graph that tracks the month-by-month dry gas production growth from various shale gas fields in the United States.  For example, it shows that production from the Haynesville Shale started to increas...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The EIA <a title="Natural Gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">Natural Gas</a> Weekly Update has an interesting graph that tracks the month-by-month dry gas production growth from various shale gas fields in the United States.  For example, it shows that production from the <a title="Haynesville Shale" href="http://geology.com/articles/haynesville-shale.shtml">Haynesville Shale</a> started to increase significantly in early 2009 and continued until today the Haynesville is the most prolific dry gas producer.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/dry-shale-gas-production-trends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fracking Backlog in North Dakota</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/fracking-backlog-in-north-dakota/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/fracking-backlog-in-north-dakota/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 05:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/fracking-backlog-in-north-dakota.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though oil production from North Dakota's Bakken Formation has propelled the state to new production records there is still a backlog of wells to be fracked.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though oil production from <a title="North Dakota" href="http://geology.com/states/north-dakota.shtml">North Dakota</a>&#8217;s <a title="Bakken Formation" href="http://geology.com/usgs/bakken-formation-oil.shtml">Bakken Formation</a> has propelled the state to new production records there is still a backlog of wells to be fracked.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/fracking-backlog-in-north-dakota/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Declining Royalty Payments from Natural Gas Wells</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2012/declining-royalty-payments-from-natural-gas-wells/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2012/declining-royalty-payments-from-natural-gas-wells/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 01:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arkansas Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barnett Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eagle Ford Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fayetteville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haynesville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydraulic Fracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niobrara Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upper Devonian Shales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica Shale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2012/declining-royalty-payments-from-natural-gas-wells.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many property owners are very surprised when the royalties that they receive from a natural gas well on their property decline sharply.  They are learning about production decline curves.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many property owners are very surprised when the royalties that they receive from a <a title="natural gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">natural gas</a> well on their property decline sharply.  They are learning about production decline curves.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2012/declining-royalty-payments-from-natural-gas-wells/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Dakota Oil Production Rising</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/north-dakota-oil-production-rising/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/north-dakota-oil-production-rising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 05:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/north-dakota-oil-production-rising.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rising production from the Bakken Shale has propelled North Dakota up to the fourth largest oil producing state behind Texas, Alaska and California.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rising production from the <a title="Bakken Shale" href="http://geology.com/usgs/bakken-formation-oil.shtml">Bakken Shale</a> has propelled North Dakota up to the fourth largest oil producing state behind Texas, <a title="Alaska" href="http://geology.com/states/alaska.shtml">Alaska</a> and <a title="California" href="http://geology.com/states/california.shtml">California</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/north-dakota-oil-production-rising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1/3 of Bakken Gas is Flared</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/13-of-bakken-gas-is-flared/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/13-of-bakken-gas-is-flared/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 14:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas Pipelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/13-of-bakken-gas-is-flared.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Energy Information Administration reports that about 1/3 of the natural gas produced from the Bakken Formation of North Dakota is flared instead of marketed because natural gas pipelines are not present in the production area or they can not accept...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a title="Energy" href="http://geology.com/news/category/energy.shtml">Energy</a> Information Administration reports that about 1/3 of the <a title="natural gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">natural gas</a> produced from the <a title="Bakken Formation" href="http://geology.com/usgs/bakken-formation-oil.shtml">Bakken Formation</a> of North Dakota is flared instead of marketed because natural gas pipelines are not present in the production area or they can not accept additional gas.  </p>
<p><img src="http://geology.com/news/2011/bakken-natural-gas.png"></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/13-of-bakken-gas-is-flared/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Learning about Oil and Gas Leases</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/learning-about-oil-and-gas-leases/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/learning-about-oil-and-gas-leases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 05:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barnett Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fayetteville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haynesville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niobrara Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica Shale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/learning-about-oil-and-gas-leases.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article in the New York Times reviews some potential rewards and problems that occur when a landowner decides to lease his property for oil and and gas development. 

Related:  Mineral Rights [1]

[1] http://geology.com/articles/mineral-rights.shtml]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An article in the <a title="New York" href="http://geology.com/states/new-york.shtml">New York</a> Times reviews some potential rewards and problems that occur when a landowner decides to lease his property for oil and and gas development. </p>
<p>Related:  <a href="http://geology.com/articles/mineral-rights.shtml">Mineral Rights</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/learning-about-oil-and-gas-leases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Dakota: Record Oil Production</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/north-dakota-record-oil-production/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/north-dakota-record-oil-production/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/north-dakota-record-oil-production.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is still more than one month remaining in 2011, but oil production in North Dakota has broken the annual record set in 2010.  The state is on-target to produce about 150 million barrels.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is still more than one month remaining in 2011, but oil production in <a title="North Dakota" href="http://geology.com/states/north-dakota.shtml">North Dakota</a> has broken the annual record set in 2010.  The state is on-target to produce about 150 million barrels.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/north-dakota-record-oil-production/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hiring Boom in North Dakota</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/hiring-boom-in-north-dakota/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/hiring-boom-in-north-dakota/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 05:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niobrara Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/hiring-boom-in-north-dakota.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thousands of high-paying new jobs are unfilled in North Dakota where natural gas and oil are being produced from the Bakken Formation, the Niobrara Shale and other rock units.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thousands of high-paying new <a title="jobs" href="http://geology.com/jobs.htm">jobs</a> are unfilled in North Dakota where <a title="natural gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">natural gas</a> and oil are being produced from the <a title="Bakken Formation" href="http://geology.com/usgs/bakken-formation-oil.shtml">Bakken Formation</a>, the Niobrara Shale and other rock units.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/hiring-boom-in-north-dakota/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Much Oil is in the Bakken?</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/how-much-oil-is-in-the-bakken/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/how-much-oil-is-in-the-bakken/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 05:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/how-much-oil-is-in-the-bakken.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although the United States Geological Survey estimates that the Bakken Formation beneath parts of North Dakota, Montana and Canada might contain over 4 billion barrels of oil, Harold Hamm, believes that it might contain up to 24 billion barrels.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the <a title="United States Geological Survey" href="http://geology.com/news/category/usgs.shtml">United States Geological Survey</a> estimates that the <a title="Bakken Formation" href="http://geology.com/usgs/bakken-formation-oil.shtml">Bakken Formation</a> beneath parts of North Dakota, <a title="Montana" href="http://geology.com/states/montana.shtml">Montana</a> and Canada might contain over 4 billion barrels of oil, Harold Hamm, believes that it might contain up to 24 billion barrels.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/how-much-oil-is-in-the-bakken/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh No!  Who Really Owns the Natural Gas in Shale?</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/oh-no-who-really-owns-the-natural-gas-in-shale/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/oh-no-who-really-owns-the-natural-gas-in-shale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 17:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barnett Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eagle Ford Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haynesville Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydraulic Fracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minerals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niobrara Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upper Devonian Shales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utica Shale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/oh-no-who-really-owns-the-natural-gas-in-shale.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is natural gas part of the shale or is it a fugitive commodity that is not an integral part of any specific rock unit?  Will a refined legal definition of natural gas in Pennsylvania overturn thousands of historic leases?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is <a title="natural gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">natural gas</a> part of the shale or is it a fugitive commodity that is not an integral part of any specific rock unit?  Will a refined legal definition of natural gas in <a title="Pennsylvania" href="http://geology.com/states/pennsylvania.shtml">Pennsylvania</a> overturn thousands of historic leases?</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/oh-no-who-really-owns-the-natural-gas-in-shale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

