<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ShaleBlog.com &#187; Alaska Gas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shaleblog.com/category/alaska-gas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shaleblog.com</link>
	<description>News about oil and natural gas from shale.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:57:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>TransCanada Gas: Overland to USA or LNG to Asia?</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/transcanada-gas-overland-to-usa-or-lng-to-asia/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/transcanada-gas-overland-to-usa-or-lng-to-asia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 19:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alaska Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LNG Import/Export]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/transcanada-gas-overland-to-usa-or-lng-to-asia.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CEO of TransCanada Corporation says that the company is still focused upon delivering their natural gas overland to the United States rather than shipping it as LNG to Asia - but Asia is an option.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CEO of TransCanada Corporation says that the company is still focused upon delivering their <a title="natural gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">natural gas</a> overland to the United States rather than shipping it as <a title="LNG" href="http://geology.com/articles/lng-liquefied-natural-gas/">LNG</a> to Asia &#8211; but Asia is an option.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/transcanada-gas-overland-to-usa-or-lng-to-asia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alaska Natural Gas to Asian Markets?</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/alaska-natural-gas-to-asian-markets/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/alaska-natural-gas-to-asian-markets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alaska Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LNG Import/Export]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/alaska-natural-gas-to-asian-markets.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alaska has an abundance of natural gas and there is a proposal in the state legislature for building a pipeline to the southcentral Alaska port where the gas would be condensed and shipped to Asian markets as LNG.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alaska has an abundance of <a title="natural gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">natural gas</a> and there is a proposal in the state legislature for building a <a title="pipeline" href="http://geology.com/news/category/pipelines.shtml">pipeline</a> to the southcentral Alaska port where the gas would be condensed and shipped to Asian markets as <a title="LNG" href="http://geology.com/articles/lng-liquefied-natural-gas/">LNG</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/alaska-natural-gas-to-asian-markets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Natural Gas is Taxed in 19 Different States</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/how-natural-gas-is-taxed-in-19-different-states/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/how-natural-gas-is-taxed-in-19-different-states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alabama Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyoming Gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/36251.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Marshall University Center for Business and Economic Research has prepared:  Taxation of Natural Gas: A Comparative Analysis.  This publication reviews the many methods of taxing natural gas 19 different states.  You might be surprised at how many ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Marshall University Center for Business and Economic Research has prepared:  Taxation of <a title="Natural Gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">Natural Gas</a>: A Comparative Analysis.  This publication reviews the many methods of taxing natural gas 19 different states.  You might be surprised at how many ways natural gas is being taxed.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/how-natural-gas-is-taxed-in-19-different-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drilling in ANWR and OCS to Cut Deficit</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/drilling-in-anwr-and-ocs-to-cut-deficit/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/drilling-in-anwr-and-ocs-to-cut-deficit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alaska Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arctic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlantic Ocean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coastal Geology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Ocean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics and Geology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geology.com/news/2011/drilling-in-anwr-and-ocs-to-cut-deficit.shtml</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some members of Congress recommend opening portions of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and the outer continental shelf for oil and natural gas drilling as a way to create jobs and cut the deficit.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some members of Congress recommend opening portions of the <a title="Arctic" href="http://geology.com/news/category/arctic.shtml">Arctic</a> National Wildlife Refuge and the outer continental shelf for oil and <a title="natural gas" href="http://geology.com/news/category/natural-gas.shtml">natural gas</a> drilling as a way to create <a title="jobs" href="http://geology.com/jobs.htm">jobs</a> and cut the deficit.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/drilling-in-anwr-and-ocs-to-cut-deficit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Dakota Oil Production May Surpass Alaska</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2011/north-dakota-oil-production-may-surpass-alaska/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2011/north-dakota-oil-production-may-surpass-alaska/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alaska Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bakken Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shale Oil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=3019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/north-dakota-county-map.gif" class="alignright"/>Oil production in North Dakota has been rising rapidly over the past few years, driven by the success of the Bakken Shale.  A &#8220;Chart of the Day&#8221; article on the Bloomberg.com website forecasts that the crude output of  North Dakota is likely to surpass that of Alaska within the next couple of years.  &#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/north-dakota-county-map.gif" class="alignright">Oil <a title="production" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/resource-production/">production</a> in North Dakota has been rising rapidly over the past few years, driven by the success of the <a title="Bakken Shale" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/bakken-shale/">Bakken Shale</a>.  A <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-01-13/north-dakota-crude-output-poised-to-pass-alaska-chart-of-the-day.html">&#8220;Chart of the Day&#8221; article</a> on the Bloomberg.com website forecasts that the crude output of  North Dakota is likely to surpass that of Alaska within the next couple of years.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2011/north-dakota-oil-production-may-surpass-alaska/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline “Not Economical”</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2010/alaska-natural-gas-pipeline-%e2%80%9cnot-economical%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2010/alaska-natural-gas-pipeline-%e2%80%9cnot-economical%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 02:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alaska Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas Pipelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas Price]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=2915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/alaska-county-map.gif" class="alignright"/>According to a FuelFix.com article, analysts at the Energy Information Administration say that “increased capital costs and lower natural gas prices make it uneconomical” to construct a new pipeline to bring natural gas from Alaska to the lower 48 states.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/alaska-county-map.gif" class="alignright">According to a <a href="http://fuelfix.com/blog/2010/12/22/eia-alaska-nat-gas-pipeline-20-years-away/">FuelFix.com article</a>, analysts at the Energy Information Administration say that “increased capital costs and lower <a title="natural gas prices" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/natural-gas-price/">natural gas prices</a> make it uneconomical” to construct a new <a title="pipeline" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/gas-pipelines/">pipeline</a> to bring natural gas from Alaska to the lower 48 states.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2010/alaska-natural-gas-pipeline-%e2%80%9cnot-economical%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Mackenzie Pipeline &#8211; Still Needed?</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2010/the-mackenzie-pipeline-still-needed/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2010/the-mackenzie-pipeline-still-needed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2010 20:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alaska Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas Pipelines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=2834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/pipeline.jpg" class="alignright"/>An article on the Financial Post website explores the Mackenzie Pipeline &#8211; a project to bring natural gas from the Canadian Arctic to southern markets.  Some people say that it is no longer needed because of recent shale gas discoveries.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/pipeline.jpg" class="alignright">An article on the <a href="http://opinion.financialpost.com/2010/12/18/mackenzie-pipeline-a-nation-builder/">Financial Post</a> website explores the Mackenzie <a title="Pipeline" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/gas-pipelines/">Pipeline</a> &#8211; a project to bring natural gas from the Canadian Arctic to southern markets.  Some people say that it is no longer needed because of recent shale gas discoveries.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2010/the-mackenzie-pipeline-still-needed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shale Gas in the Lower 48 Makes an Alaska Pipeline Unnecessary?</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2010/shale-gas-in-the-lower-48-makes-an-alaska-pipeline-unnecessary/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2010/shale-gas-in-the-lower-48-makes-an-alaska-pipeline-unnecessary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 21:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alaska Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas Pipelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas Price]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=2147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/alaska-county-map.gif" class="alignright"/>TransCanada Corporation and Denali both want to build a pipeline across Alaska and into Canada to deliver Alaskan natural gas to US markets.  However, their economics are being damaged by inexpensive natural gas from numerous shale gas fields.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://shaleblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/alaska-county-map.gif" class="alignright">TransCanada Corporation and Denali both want to build a <a title="pipeline" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/gas-pipelines/">pipeline</a> across Alaska and into <a title="Canada" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/canada-gas/">Canada</a> to deliver Alaskan natural gas to US markets.  However, their economics are being damaged by inexpensive natural gas from numerous shale gas fields.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2010/shale-gas-in-the-lower-48-makes-an-alaska-pipeline-unnecessary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shale Gas is Going to Displace North Slope&#8217;s Demand</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2010/shale-gas-is-going-to-displace-north-slopes-demand/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2010/shale-gas-is-going-to-displace-north-slopes-demand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shaleblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alaska Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas Pipelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource & Production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=1352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The new abundance of natural gas produced from shale plays in the 48 states is going to damage the economics of the North Slope, Alaska gas industry.  An article in NewsMiner addresses the impact on production companies.  An article on KTUU.com addresses the impact on pipeline projects.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new abundance of natural gas produced from shale plays in the 48 states is going to damage the economics of the North Slope, Alaska gas industry.  An <a href="http://newsminer.com/view/full_story/6611570/article-Lawmakers-concerned-shale-gas-technology-will-affect-value-of-Alaska-s-reserves?instance=home_news_window_left_bullets">article in NewsMiner</a> addresses the impact on <a title="production" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/resource-production/">production</a> companies.  An <a href="http://www.ktuu.com/Global/story.asp?S=12106774">article on KTUU.com</a> addresses the impact on <a title="pipeline" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/gas-pipelines/">pipeline</a> projects.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2010/shale-gas-is-going-to-displace-north-slopes-demand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TransCanada Natural Gas Pipeline &#8211; Still Needed?</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2010/transcanada-natural-gas-pipeline-still-needed/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2010/transcanada-natural-gas-pipeline-still-needed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 04:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shaleblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alaska Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas Pipelines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=1276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An article on the Reuters website argues that the TransCanada Pipeline will still be need &#8211; after several major US gas plays are rapidly being developed.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN0211658920100202?type=marketsNews">article on the Reuters website</a> argues that the <a href="http://www.thealaskapipelineproject.com">TransCanada Pipeline</a> will still be need &#8211; after several major US gas plays are rapidly being developed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2010/transcanada-natural-gas-pipeline-still-needed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Competing Natural Gas Pipeline Projects in Alaska</title>
		<link>http://shaleblog.com/2010/competing-natural-gas-pipeline-projects-in-alaska/</link>
		<comments>http://shaleblog.com/2010/competing-natural-gas-pipeline-projects-in-alaska/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shaleblog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alaska Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas Pipelines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shaleblog.com/?p=1244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A Houston Chronicle article reports that a proposed pipeline to carry natural gas from the North Slope, through Canada and on to markets in Alaska and the 48 states could cost up to $41 billion.  A competing project would carry the gas to a proposed LNG facility at Valdez.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/6842385.html">Houston Chronicle</a> article reports that a proposed <a title="pipeline" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/gas-pipelines/">pipeline</a> to carry natural gas from the North Slope, through <a title="Canada" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/canada-gas/">Canada</a> and on to markets in Alaska and the 48 states could cost up to $41 billion.  A competing project would carry the gas to a proposed <a title="LNG" href="http://shaleblog.com/category/lng/">LNG</a> facility at Valdez.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shaleblog.com/2010/competing-natural-gas-pipeline-projects-in-alaska/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

