A Houston Chronicle article reports that a proposed pipeline to carry natural gas from the North Slope, through Canada and on to markets in Alaska and the 48 states could cost up to $41 billion. A competing project would carry the gas to a proposed LNG facility at Valdez.
Related Topics:
- Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline “Not Economical”
- New Shale Plays Remove Risk from Some Pipeline Projects
- Shale Gas in the Lower 48 Makes an Alaska Pipeline Unnecessary?
- Alaska Natural Gas to Asian Markets?
- Jersey City Zoning vs Natural Gas Pipeline
- Land Ownership Problems as Papua New Guinea Anticipates Natural Gas Projects
- The Mackenzie Pipeline – Still Needed?
- Fayetteville Express Pipeline – 2BCF/day
- TransCanada Natural Gas Pipeline – Still Needed?
- LNG Import Projects Abandoned
- North Dakota Oil Production May Surpass Alaska
- 42-Inch Pipeline for Haynesville Shale Gas
- A Pipeline from the Marcellus Shale to Chicago
- Will the Gulf Oil Spill Put the Brakes on Shale Projects?
- Consumers Angry about $2.2B Pipeline Modernization Plan
- The Marcellus Shale Pipeline Challenge
- Which Comes First? The Pipeline or the Well?
- 36″ Pipeline Blast in Texas
- More Pipeline Capacity Needed in the Northeast
- Russia Opens Gas Pipeline to Germany
